Enjoy the latest news and events

QVGOP News Online

Available on your computer, tablet or any mobile device

Call NYC Elected Officials on Question of Testing and Tracing Shadow Populations

CALL YOUR LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIALS!!
FIGHT BACK!! 
WE THE PEOPLE WANT ANSWERS!!

**** Read Open Letter to NYC Elected Officials below ****

CALL, WRITE, AND EMAIL YOUR REPS. 
ASK: WHAT IS THE PLAN TO TEST AND TRACE THE MORE THAN ONE MILLION PEOPLE LIVING IN THE SHADOWS IN NYC?
ASK THESE QUESTIONS:

ASK YOUR STATE ELECTEDS: How is mass testing and contact tracing going to be done by May 15 according to the Governor’s blueprint, so NYC can come safely out of lockdown, when large swaths of the city’s population are unaccountable, undocumented, homeless, and living in the shadows?

ASK YOUR CITY ELECTEDS: What is the city’s plan to identify, test, trace and quarantine those who test positive, from NYC’s most virus-prone populations of over one million illegal immigrants, homeless, and inmates recently released from city jails?

Find your New York State Assembly member here
Find your New York State Senator here.
Find you New York City Council Member here

We the people have to rise up and hold our elected officials accountable for a solution to the question of testing, tracing and quarantining the shadow populations of NYC!!!

It was their progressive policies that welcomed them here to our city and created this colossal  mess!!

 

Open Letter to NYC Elected Officials on Question of Testing and Tracing Shadow Populations From the Queens Village Republican Club. 

www.QVGOP.org
April 27, 2020
CONTACT: Joe Concannon
PHONE: 347-946-1931

EMAIL: INFO@qvgop.org

Governor Cuomo announced that New York will be on lockdown until May 15 in order to diminish the spread of the deadly virus and to insure there will be no renewed outbreak, and then will re-evaluate whether or not we could even move to Phase One, which is a gradual lifting of restrictions.  At this point no one, not the governor or any other elected official knows when New York will be safe to open for business.

The key element in the governor’s blueprint to open NY is mass testing and contact tracing. But how is this going to be done by May 15 when large swaths of the city’s population are unaccountable, undocumented, and living in the shadows? This includes the city’s most virus-prone populations of over one million undocumented immigrants, homeless, and inmates recently released from city jails.

This is not a partisan issue. This is about protecting all New Yorkers and getting NYC back to work safely. It is well known that many immigrants here illegally are scared to visit a doctor or hospital to seek treatment for fear of being arrested and deported. How much more unlikely will it be that they would divulge their name, address and personal information for testing or submit to interviews for tracing their contacts?

Now that everyone must be identified, tested, and traced, how are we supposed to identify and do the same to the undocumented populations of the city? The hardest hit pandemic hotspots in NYC are Elmhurst, the epicenter of the virus, Corona, Jackson Heights and Flushing, and other towns, home to vast proportions of the city’s undocumented immigrants. The #1 priority should be to test these zip codes first.

Will the information the city and state has already gathered be released? Will the tracing be done by public health personnel trained to do this work, rather than community groups or churches? How is the MTA going to make sure the subways are safe from the virus if these shadow populations are not tested or traced?

These are the primary questions. We want answers from our elected officials. Please refer to the complete letter here. 


Stanford scientist John Ioannidis finds himself under attack for questioning the prevailing wisdom about lockdowns

The Bearer of Good Coronavirus News

Stanford scientist John Ioannidis finds himself under attack for questioning the prevailing wisdom about lockdowns.

This is reposted from the April 24, 2020 opinion column in the Wall Street Journal  by Allysia Finley

Defenders of coronavirus lockdown mandates keep talking about science. “We are going to do the right thing, not judge by politics, not judge by protests, but by science,” California’s Gov. Gavin Newsom said this week. Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer defended an order that, among other things, banned the sale of paint and vegetable seeds but not liquor or lottery tickets. “Each action has been informed by the best science and epidemiology counsel there is,” she wrote in an op-ed.

But scientists are almost never unanimous, and many appeals to “science” are transparently political or ideological. Consider the story of John Ioannidis, a professor at Stanford’s School of Medicine. His expertise is wide-ranging—he juggles appointments in statistics, biomedical data, prevention research and health research and policy. Google Scholar ranks him among the world’s 100 most-cited scientists. He has published more than 1,000 papers, many of them meta-analyses—reviews of other studies. Yet he’s now found himself pilloried because he dissents from the theories behind the lockdowns—because he’s looked at the data and found good news.

In a March article for Stat News, Dr. Ioannidis argued that Covid-19 is far less deadly than modelers were assuming. He considered the experience of the Diamond Princess cruise ship, which was quarantined Feb. 4 in Japan. Nine of 700 infected passengers and crew died. Based on the demographics of the ship’s population, Dr. Ioannidis estimated that the U.S. fatality rate could be as low as 0.025% to 0.625% and put the upper bound at 0.05% to 1%—comparable to that of seasonal flu.

“If that is the true rate,” he wrote, “locking down the world with potentially tremendous social and financial consequences may be totally irrational. It’s like an elephant being attacked by a house cat. Frustrated and trying to avoid the cat, the elephant accidentally jumps off a cliff and dies.”

Dr. Ioannidis, 54, likes metaphors. A New York native who grew up in Athens, he also teaches comparative literature and has published seven literary works—poetry and fiction, the latest being an epistolary novel—in Greek. In his spare time, he likes to fence, swim, hike and play basketball.

Early in his career, he realized that “the common denominator for everything that I was doing was that I was very interested in the methods—not necessarily the results but how exactly you do that, how exactly you try to avoid bias, how you avoid error.” When he began examining studies, he discovered that few headline-grabbing findings could be replicated, and many were later contradicted by new evidence.

Scientific studies are often infected by biases. “Several years ago, along with one of my colleagues, we had mapped 235 biases across science. And maybe the biggest cluster is biases that are trying to generate significant, spectacular, fascinating, extraordinary results,” he says. “Early results tend to be inflated. Claims for significance tend to be exaggerated.”

An example is a 2012 meta-analysis on nutritional research, in which he randomly selected 50 common cooking ingredients, such as sugar, flour and milk. Eighty percent of them had been studied for links to cancer, and 72% of the studies linked an ingredient to a higher or lower risk. Yet three-quarters of the findings were weak or statistically insignificant.

Dr. Ioannidis calls the coronavirus pandemic “the perfect storm of that quest for very urgent, spectacular, exciting, apocalyptic results. And as you see, apparently our early estimates seem to have been tremendously exaggerated in many fronts.”

Chief among them was a study by modelers at Imperial College London, which predicted more than 2.2 million coronavirus deaths in the U.S. absent “any control measures or spontaneous changes in individual behaviour.” The study was published March 16—the same day the Trump administration released its “15 Days to Slow the Spread” initiative, which included strict social-distancing guidelines.

Dr. Ioannidis says the Imperial projection now appears to be a gross overestimate. “They used inputs that were completely off in some of their calculation,” he says. “If data are limited or flawed, their errors are being propagated through the model. . . . So if you have a small error, and you exponentiate that error, the magnitude of the final error in the prediction or whatever can be astronomical.”

“I love models,” he adds. “I do a lot of mathematical modeling myself. But I think we need to recognize that they’re very, very low in terms of how much weight we can place on them and how much we can trust them. . . . They can give you a very first kind of mathematical justification to a gut feeling, but beyond that point, depending on models for evidence, I think it’s a very bad recipe.”

Modelers sometimes refuse to disclose their assumptions or data, so their errors go undetected. Los Angeles County predicted last week that 95.6% of its population would be infected by August if social distancing orders were relaxed. (Confirmed cases were 0.17% of the population as of Thursday.) But the basis for this projection is unclear. “At a minimum, we need openness and transparency in order to be able to say anything,” Dr. Ioannidis says.

Most important, “what we need is data. We need real data. We need data on how many people are infected so far, how many people are actively infected, what is really the death rate, how many beds do we have to spare, how has this changed.”

That will require more testing. Dr. Ioannidis and colleagues at Stanford last week published a study on the prevalence of coronavirus antibodies in Santa Clara County. Based on blood tests of 3,300 volunteers in the county—which includes San Jose, California’s third-largest city—during the first week of April, they estimated that between 2.49% and 4.16% of the county population had been infected. That’s 50 to 85 times the number of confirmed cases and implies a fatality rate between 0.12% and 0.2%, consistent with that of the Diamond Princess.

The study immediately came under attack. Some statisticians questioned its methods. Critics noted the study sample was not randomly selected, and white women under 64 were disproportionately represented. The Stanford team adjusted for the sampling bias by weighting the results by sex, race and ZIP Code, but the study acknowledges that “other biases, such as bias favoring individuals in good health capable of attending our testing sites, or bias favoring those with prior Covid-like illnesses seeking antibody confirmation are also possible. The overall effect of such biases is hard to ascertain.”

Dr. Ioannidis admits his study isn’t “bulletproof” and says he welcomes scrutiny. But he’s confident the findings will hold up, and he says antibody studies from around the world will yield more data. A study published this week by the University of Southern California and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health estimated that the virus is 28 to 55 times as prevalent in that county as confirmed cases are. A New York study released Thursday estimated that 13.9% of the state and 21.2% of the city had been infected, more than 10 times the confirmed cases.

Yet most criticism of the Stanford study has been aimed at defending the lockdown mandates against the implication that they’re an overreaction. “There’s some sort of mob mentality here operating that they just insist that this has to be the end of the world, and it has to be that the sky is falling. It’s attacking studies with data based on speculation and science fiction,” he says. “But dismissing real data in favor of mathematical speculation is mind-boggling.”

In part he blames the media: “We have some evidence that bad news, negative news [stories], are more attractive than positive news—they lead to more clicks, they lead to people being more engaged. And of course we know that fake news travels faster than true news. So in the current environment, unfortunately, we have generated a very heavily panic-driven, horror-driven, death-reality-show type of situation.”

The news is filled with stories of healthy young people who die of coronavirus. But Dr. Ioannidis recently published a paper with his wife, Despina Contopoulos-Ioannidis, an infectious-disease specialist at Stanford, that showed this to be a classic man-bites-dog story. The couple found that people under 65 without underlying conditions accounted for only 0.7% of coronavirus deaths in Italy and 1.8% in New York City.

“Compared to almost any other cause of disease that I can think of, it’s really sparing young people. I’m not saying that the lives of 80-year-olds do not have value—they do,” he says. “But there’s far, far, far more . . . young people who commit suicide.” If the panic and attendant disruption continue, he says, “we will see many young people committing suicide . . . just because we are spreading horror stories with Covid-19. There’s far, far more young people who get cancer and will not be treated, because again, they will not go to the hospital to get treated because of Covid-19. There’s far, far more people whose mental health will collapse.”

He argues that public officials need to weigh these factors when making public-health decisions, and more hard data from antibody and other studies will help. “I think that we should just take everything that we know, put it on the table, and try to see, OK, what’s the next step, and see what happens when we take the next step. I think this sort of data-driven feedback will be the best. So you start opening, you start opening your schools. You can see what happens,” he says. “We need to be open minded, we need to just be calm, allow for some error, it’s unavoidable. We started knowing nothing. We know a lot now, but we still don’t know everything.”

He cautions against drawing broad conclusions about the efficacy of lockdowns based on national infection and fatality rates. “It’s not that we have randomized 10 countries to go into lockdown and another 10 countries to remain relatively open and see what happens, and do that randomly. Different prime ministers, different presidents, different task forces make decisions, they implement them in different sequences, at different times, in different phases of the epidemic. And then people start looking at this data and they say, ‘Oh look at that, this place did very well. Why? Oh, because of this measure.’ This is completely, completely opinion-based.”

People are making “big statements about ‘lockdowns save the world.’ I think that they’re immature. They’re tremendously immature. They may have worked in some cases, they may have had no effect in others, and they may have been damaging still in others.”

Most disagreements among scientists, he notes, reflect differences in perspective, not facts. Some find the Stanford study worrisome because it suggests the virus is more easily transmitted, while others are hopeful because it suggests the virus is far less lethal. “It’s basically an issue of whether you’re an optimist or a pessimist. Even scientists can be optimists and pessimists. Probably usually I’m a pessimist, but in this case, I’m probably an optimist.”


Open Letter to New York City and State Representatives and Lawmakers

Open Letter to New York City and State Representatives and Lawmakers

***See media coverage below***

We want answers: How is mass testing and contact tracing going to be done by May 15th according to the Governor’s blueprint, when large swaths of the city’s population are unaccountable, undocumented, homeless, and living in the shadows?

Queens Village, NY – Governor Cuomo announced that New York State will be on lockdown until May 15 in order to diminish the spread of the deadly virus and to insure there will be no renewed outbreak, and then will re-evaluate when to “Un-Pause NY.”  In other words, after May 15th the Governor would assess whether or not New York could even move to Phase One, which is a gradual lifting of restrictions. 
 
When asked when the lockdown will be over, he said: “It’s over when you have a vaccine. And that’s 12 to 18 months away.” Also, de Blasio recently announced that the city is canceling all non-essential events including concerts, festivals, and parades, through June to slow the spread of the virus.
 
At this point no one, not the governor or any other elected official knows when New York will be safe to open for business and people can return to their jobs and normal lives, whether it will take weeks, months or over a year as he has intimated. It’s common sense that New York City cannot survive a lockdown of 12 to 18 months. It may not even survive more than a month of the current economic shutdown, with the concurrent outbreak of business bankruptcies, crime, mental illness, domestic violence, drug overdoses, and general breakdown of law and order and civil society. A lockdown going into June will be disaster for the city.
 
Many important measures in the governor’s blueprint to get back to a “new normal” are practicing social distancing, staying home, keeping non-essential business establishments closed, stockpiling PPE, and other measures. But the key element is mass testing and contact tracing. Cuomo said “Why is testing so important? Testing is how you monitor the rate of infection. Testing is how we find people with the virus and trace their contacts. The challenge is to bring testing up to scale.”
 
The big question is how is this mass testing and tracking going to occur by May 15th when large swaths of the city’s population are unaccountable, undocumented, and living in the shadows? This includes the city’s most virus-prone populations: over one million illegal immigrants, more than 78,000 homeless, and 1500 inmates recently released from city jails.
 
This is not a partisan issue. This is about protecting all New Yorkers and getting NYC back to work safely and securely. It is well known that many immigrants here illegally are scared to visit a doctor or hospital to seek treatment for fear of being arrested and deported. How much more unlikely will it be that they would divulge their name, address and personal information for testing or submit to interviews for their contacts?
 
Now that everyone must be identified, tested, and traced, how are we supposed to identify and do the same to the illegal immigrant population of the city? The hardest hit pandemic hotspots in NYC are Elmhurst, the epicenter of the virus, Corona, Jackson Heights and Flushing, and other towns, home to vast proportions of the city’s illegal immigrants. Shouldn’t these hotspots of the disease be the first zip codes tested rather than Bayside, Oakland Gardens, Douglaston, for example and other zip codes with a significantly lower number of cases?
 
Will the DMV release the information on the data-protected Driver’s Licenses issued to illegal aliens? Will the IRS release their Tax ID data? How will public health personnel locate and verify that they are tested and document the results? Can churches and community associations be relied upon to gather and turn over data to health officials?
 
Since the virus hit, the undocumented and homeless populations have taken over our subway system, which is a big contributing factor to New York’s excessive number of infections and fatalities. In contrast, cities without massive underground public subway systems, such as California’s municipalities, have much lower rates of infection.  How will the MTA clean and disinfect our subways and prevent another massive outbreak from homeless and undocumented riders when the city comes out of lockdown?
 
These questions are just the beginnings of an issue that no one is talking about. This is the tip of the iceberg of a momentous task to implement the guidelines in order to safely move the city to lifting the restrictions and getting back to work. No one is addressing it. We want answers, otherwise it is not out of the question to fear the worst consequences for our city. Can we see a repeat of the history we never learned from, the real chaos and disaster, on the level of the Great Depression, the Black Plague, or the Spanish Flu?  We want answers to our questions from our city and state representatives and lawmakers!

Members of the Queens Village Republican Club
April 21, 2020

Additional Media Coverage

One America News Network

 

WABC Radio: Rich Valdes – This is America – Coronavirus Special (start 11:00 minutes)

 

Queens GOP Club Demand Answers From Cuomo, de Blasio over COVID-19
Queens County Politics

Open Letter to NYC Elected Officials from the Queens Village Republican Club
Yahoo Finance


The Global Threat to U.S. Hegemony

The Global Threat to U.S. Hegemony

By Professor Nicholas Giordano

 

Professor Nicholas Giordano

If the last month has proved anything, it should be the threat that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) poses to the global community. For decades, American administrations, except for the Trump administration, have placated China. They acquiesced out of fear that we will lose access to cheap goods and the potential 1.3-billion-person marketplace. It is due to this benign approach that many of us are on lockdowns, and the U.S. economy, as well as the global economy, are in shambles.

Over the course of the last 30 years, the Communist government of China has been working on their grand strategy to become the dominant superpower by 2049. They grew their economy and increased stability to maintain their authoritarian rule. They continued, unencumbered, to build their national military strength. Now they are ready for the last two major goals. The first being to weaken Taiwan’s international standing that will allow China to recapture Taiwan. The second is far more detrimental, and that’s to replace the U.S. world order.

While China has been working on multiple fronts to achieve these objectives, they faced little pushback from the U.S. and the global community. We willingly underestimated China’s capabilities. America was afraid to use the full weight of our power and strength to ensure countries are playing by our rules. After all, we are the benign superpower. In fact, our policymakers and the corporate elite were fearful of calling out the CCP because they worried China would cut off access to their markets. Just look at the pathetic attempt by the NBA, and athletes like Lebron James, who bowed down to China after the GM of the Houston Rockets, Daryl Morey, dared to criticize the CCP’s hardline approach in Hong Kong. Failures like these embolden the CCP and continue the perception that the U.S. is weak and feckless.

China continually thumbs its nose at the international order, and their strategies to acquire power are extraordinarily sophisticated. China weaponized their currency and the economy by continuing to devalue the Yuan and increase trade deficits throughout the world. They want the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) to replace the World Bank, where the United States has the largest voting share. All in an effort to replace the dollar as the world’s currency.

They have a coordinated corporate espionage and intellectual property theft on a massive scale. They force companies to sign partnership agreements if they want access to China’s marketplaces. This has cost the United States trillions of dollars over the last 20 years. They routinely conduct cyber intrusions, penetrating our critical infrastructure and key resources in an effort to exploit vulnerabilities. They infiltrated college campuses throughout the country to cultivate the next generation of American engineers and scientists to be assets for future intelligence endeavors. They set up Confucius Institutes to immerse Americans in “Chinese culture and history” when it is really nothing more than a propaganda machine designed to influence students to the CCP.

Perhaps, the most dangerous of all is China’s Belt and Road Initiative. A number of countries are desperate for money, and the CCP has laid out debt traps throughout the world. China entices these countries with a money supply, particularly for large critical infrastructure projects. The stipulations of the loan are that a Chinese company must be hired to run the project. The people of the country are employed for the menial labor, but Chinese labor is brought in to actually operate the facilities. If a country is unable to pay back the loan, the CCP then owns the infrastructure facility. If a foreign country controls your airports, electricity plants, port system, water supply plants, etc. do you have sovereignty or are you held hostage by the CCP? Quite genius if you think about it.

The U.S. needs to wake-up. The lies and deception have cost tens of thousands of lives, and have plunged our economy, and the global economy, into a recession, perhaps even a depression. It is time countries join together and hold the CCP accountable. It is time we bring critical manufacturing sectors back to the U.S. It is time to reduce our dependency on China. It is time we lead the world again and take our power back.

Nicholas Giordano is Professor of Political Science at Suffolk Community College and host of The P.A.S. Report Podcast


Open America Now!

Open America Now!

By Phil Orenstein

Editor’s Note: Jerry Matacotta, historian, and founder of History Seminar Series at QCC provided historical background and assistance for this column.

We Republicans cherish our Freedom. We believe in our country’s birthright in Liberty. We want America open for business. We are Americans, a brave, proud and free people. We’re not good little obedient subjects of big government bureaucrats.  We want America open now!

We stand with President Trump who is plotting our course to economic recovery, to open the economy quickly: “We’re winning our battle, we’re winning our war… We want to get our country back to where it was. We want to open our country and we want to do it quickly.”

To blame the virus on Trump or anyone else, as the media and politicians are doing, is either ignorant or evil. The fault is not Trump’s, it’s not Italy’s, not the bats nor the Wuhan wet markets. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is the cause of the global death count and the collapse of the world’s economies. But politicians and journalists bankrolled by the CCP and their global affiliates, who want to keep the country closed, are blaming Trump in order to defeat him in November. The New York Times concocted a narrative that Trump was incompetent and late to act and now people are dying. The Boston Globe headliner was “Trump’s coronavirus advice just might kill us.”  House Speaker Pelosi accused Trump of deception and lies leading to “unnecessary deaths and economic disaster.” The Democrats and the media are saying the blood is on Trump’s hands, not China’s.  They are on the side of the enemy, Communist China, and they have no qualms about playing politics with the virus, destroying our country, shutting down our economy, and if possible keeping the pandemic going until November to get rid of Trump.

While the rest of New York State and the country are desperately yearning to open the economy and breathe the fresh scent of freedom once again, Mayor de Blasio, wants to keep society closed. In a decision that rattled even Governor Cuomo, he announced that all city schools would remain closed for the rest of the school year sending the message that the CCP virus won. Keeping our schools, businesses, beaches and restaurants closed for so long as de Blasio intends to do, are decisions that can destroy the lives and fortunes of millions of New Yorkers. He needs to be shut down and locked up.

Wartime presidents Lincoln, Wilson and FDR invoked the War Powers Act, and although President Trump is loath to use it, he should do so, and arrest de Blasio for sedition. History’s traitors and defectors were rightfully punished and imprisoned for aiding and abetting the enemy and inciting opposition to America, as our nation went to war and rose up to battle the enemies of freedom.

Exploiting the pandemic just like his leftist colleagues, AOC and Ilhan Omar who recently called for a socialist overhaul of the federal government, de Blasio and other Democrat lawmakers are going after the landlords, calling on the Rent Guidelines Board to freeze rents for all regulated apartments, and to allow New Yorkers to pay rent with their security deposits.

In their violent overthrow of the capitalist system, the bloody communist revolutions of Lenin, Stalin, and Mao, the first step was to go after the landlords and confiscate their land and estates, which was distributed to the impoverished peasants, who then became slaves of the tyrant government. Communist revolution is part of de Blasio’s DNA.

De Blasio capitulated to the CCP in the war against this invisible viral enemy versus humanity. De Blasio’s declaration of defeat is like sentencing New Yorkers to prison in their houses for months.  It’s holding NYC hostage to the virus. It’s FDR surrendering to Japan after the bombing of Pearl Harbor. Instead of rallying all New Yorkers saying “the only thing we have to fear is fear itself” de Blasio surrendered, giving everyone in the city fear and paranoia.

There needs to be a city-wide outcry against de Blasio shouting him down from every open window. But where are our city’s politicians, where are our religious leaders, where are the activists, the community organizers? Where are their booming voices now that we need them to get our city back on track, to re-open our city, protect our school kids, save our fellow New Yorkers from economic collapse, fear and desperation? Alas, they are all in hiding, scared to death of the CCP virus, hunkered down in isolation, living in bondage, hording their toilet paper.

The Spanish Flu killed 675,000 in the U.S. but political leaders still led, the city council still met, and people still voted. When the Blitz hit England and bombed the House of Lords, Parliament still met and gave the people hope and courage. Our heroic firefighters and police officers ran into the burning towers on 9/11 giving up their lives to save our fellow New Yorkers. In the worst of times, leaders rose up fearlessly leading their constituents to have faith, hope, and conquer the enemy.

We don’t have any real leaders today except for President Trump, our Commander in Chief, who is courageously leading the battle to defeat the CCP virus! He’s guiding us to be strong, to know that faith defeats the pandemic, courage wins the battle, hope is triumphant.

How many more months are people going to stay imprisoned in their homes and look out their windows? We say no longer! Open our city and let us breath free, do business, dine at our favorite restaurants, have meetings, go to the beach, to weddings, to the game, to church, to synagogue, socialize, drink beer with friends, be free! Most importantly, to vote! To vote every Democrat out! Boot out the enemies of freedom! Elections have consequences. Voting matters now more than ever! Open America Now!


How Clinton Admin Allowed China To Rob America’s Natural Resources; Laid Groundwork For Recent Threat To Cut Off Critical Supplies During COVID-19

How Clinton Admin Allowed China To Rob America’s Natural Resources; Laid Groundwork For Recent Threat To Cut Off Critical Supplies During COVID-19

By Robert Golomb

Editor’s Note: This is syndicated columnist Bob Golomb’s latest column as published in The Published Reporter and other media

On October 10, 2000, just around three months before his second and final term in office was to end, President Clinton signed The China Trade Bill into law. That law granted China even further access to American technology. Photo credit: AFP / Mario Tama.

NEW YORK, NY – “The Middle East has oil, China has rare earths,” Deng Xiaoping the “Supreme Leader” of China proudly and defiantly stated to America and to the world back in 1992. With China justifiably receiving world condemnation for its role in starting and spreading the coronavirus  Xiaoping’s eight words might sound even more ominous today than they did then.

The Rare Earth’s to which Xiaoping was referring to are known in the scientific community as Rare Earth Elements (REE’s). REE’s are composed of a set of 17 complex elements, all of which are essential components of the products manufactured by America’s four most important industries- high-tech, pharmaceuticals, defense and energy; and incredibly, China now controls 80% of REE’s sales to America, and throughout the world.                                            

It might come as a shock to the millions of Americans who regularly purchase such modern high-tech items as computers, Hi-definition-flat screen televisions, iPhones, iPads and laptops that the Chinese control 80% of the rare earth elements required to make these products. In other words, while it was American scientists, entrepreneurs and workers who helped build these products, it is the Chinese through their control of REE’s who have reaped the billions of dollars of profits derived from the components used to make them.                                          

It might come as even more of a shock to the men and women who serve in the American armed forces that the Chinese possess (once again) 80% of the REE’s used to develop such essential military equipment and weaponry as night vision goggles, guided missiles, fighter jets and SONAR systems. In other words, the American armed forces are dependent upon China, widely viewed as our nation’s greatest military threat, to defend our nation in the event that Communist country launched an attack upon our homeland.                                                         

Further, Americans, particularly during this time of the coronavirus pandemic caused by China, would be shocked to learn that China, the nation, in large part due to its 80% control of REE’s market, manufacture 90% of all of the antibiotics prescribed in America, even as American pharmaceutical companies hold the largest number of drug patents in the world. In other words, we now almost fully rely upon China, the nation responsible for creating this awful health crisis, for the production of antibiotics developed in the U.S. to treat Americans suffering from almost every major bacterial infection, including, ironically, those especially unfortunate coronavirus victims who have also been inflicted with a related life threatening secondary bacterial infection.                                                         

Lastly, Americans who depend upon petroleum to fuel and run their cars, refrigerate their food, heat their homes in the winter and cool them in the summer (nearly every one of us) would be startled to learn that China controls (once again) 80% of the REE’s critical in refining this petroleum into gasoline, as well as other sources of energy. In other words, if China decided to end its supply of REE’s to the U.S., America could well become a third world nation.

Sadly, history informs us that it should have been America rather than China dominating the mining, processing and marketing of these precious elements.                   

That history of REE’s began in 1787 in the mountains of the nation of Sweden. There, a scientist named Lt. Colonel Carl Axel Arrhenius made the first recorded discovery of REE’s. However, it was a discovery which Sweden chose not to take advantage of at the time, and thus made little impact upon them or the rest of the world for the next 170 years.  

But that was to change beginning in December, 1941 with America’s entry into World War II (1941-1945). As that devastating war continued, which before it ended was to claim more than 60 million lives across the globe, hundreds of America’s top scientists worked in Los Alamos, New Mexico on a program code named the “Manhattan Project.” The challenge of these scientists, who included the famed Robert OppenheimerEdward Teller and Enrico Fermi, was to discover the secret of how to split the atom for the purpose of building an atomic bomb.                    

The key to unlocking that secret, American scientists discovered in 1944, was that REE’s were the essential components used in the complex process involved in purifying uranium to the minute level required to build and detonate an atomic bomb.                                                                             

Applying that knowledge, America built two atomic bombs. The first- detonated over the Japanese city of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, killing more than 90 thousand people, and the second- dropped over Nagasaki three days later, killing an estimated 40,000 – ending WWII with the surrender of Japan on August 15, 1945.

With the devastating war finally over, American scientists, understanding the importance of REE’s, discovered in the mountains of southern California in 1954 an enormous mine containing the largest quantity of this precious element then known to the world. That mine, later named The Mountain Pass California Mine (MPCM), along with the top American scientists who became proficient on how to mine and refine the REE’s extracted from it, seemingly guaranteed the continuance of the U.S.’ almost total control of this history altering natural resource.

Still, with the notable exception of the discovery in the early 1960’s of the color television by REE’s research scientists, America’s total control of REE’s was put to little commercial use to benefit the average American, rather primarily remaining within the domain of our domestic defense industries and the U.S. Pentagon.                                

But that was to change in the early to middle 1980’s, due to the genius and ambition of one of the most financially powerful and most politically influential American corporations, the automobile giant, General Motors (GM). It was during those years that GM secured multi-million-dollar Pentagon grants, which GM’s researchers used to develop a new category of REE’s, Heavy Rare Earth Elements (HREE’s). From there, scientists soon made another major discovery: HREE’s could be refined and transformed into a new category of magnets, permanent magnets.

Many times more powerful than the existing magnets that they largely replaced, these heavy rare earth based permanent magnets became the magnets used by most major American industries. With the advent of these more powerful magnets, speakers in stereos, earphones and televisions became louder and longer lasting; computers became smaller and faster; automobiles became safer and better equipped; fossil fuel became easier for drillers to extract from the earth and refine into gasoline; MRI’s presented clearer images for doctors to read to detect diseases and injuries; and drugs became less expensive to manufacture and cheaper to buy. But this success was to present GM with a new challenge.      

By 1986, GM, finding it increasingly difficult to keep up with the growing demand for these revolutionary magnets, created a separate division, Magnequench, to take over the job. Housed in Indiana, Magnequench, was in 1987 assigned the daunting task of manufacturing  permanent magnets throughout America and most of the western world.                                                  

Magnequench accomplished just that. In the seven years leading up to 1994, it solidified its national and international control of the sale and production of permanent magnets. In short, during that time span permanent magnets were made in America by American workers and sold in America and throughout the rest of the world, as also were the original REE’s (then named Light REE’s, (LREE’S) to distinguish between the 2) and HREE’s, which continued to be used for a multitude of commercial and military purposes. But that was to change. And, it is here that the malign presence of China begins to be felt.            

After decades of heavily government funded successful domestic mining for LREE’s and HREE’s, China – aided by cheap labor and an absence of environmental restrictions – had by 1994 actually surpassed America in the mining of these elements. However, the Chinese were still faced with one enormous problem: they lacked the technical expertise to refine HREE’s into its most sought-after by-product, permanent magnets.

The Chinese, though, were to find a way. And from here the story becomes ugly. In 1995, GM, still the legal owner of Magnequench, had agreed to sell its lucrative subsidiary for the relatively small asking price of $70 million to the little – known company, the Sextant group, a small consortium owned by wealthy Chinese and American nationals. While drawing little media attention at the time, the relatively minor asking price of $70 million for a company controlling advanced technology designed for both military and commercial uses to a partially foreign owned company should seemingly have created very serious concerns and a corresponding careful investigation by then President Clinton (1992-2000).    

As president, Clinton, through a 1988 federal law, had been granted the power to block any financial transaction made between an American and a foreign owned company, were it determined, as the law was written, that “there is credible evidence that leads the President to believe that the foreign interest exercising control might take action that threatens to impair national security.”    

Clinton apparently did not find such “credible evidence.” Or to be more precise, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), a federal agency that had been established under the Reagan Administration to review such complex transactions, found no such evidence. So, with the stamp of approval of the CFUIS, the sale went through in 1995, even as little media attention was given to the fact that CFUIS was under the tight control of the Clinton Administration. 

From there on, the ugly picture became even more filled with the face of President Clinton. That same year, his Administration made the decision to totally shut down the doors of the U.S. Bureau of Mines, which had been the leading global player in the research and development of energy sources, including LREE’s and HREE’s; and equally disturbing, during that same time span, Sexton began the process of shutting down the Magnequench plant in Indiana and transferring all operations to a factory located in China, all while President Clinton remained remarkably silent.    

And in 1998, just 3 years later, the Clinton Administration placed its sights on the mostly rare earth developed mine in the U.S., the aforementioned MPCM. And here, Clinton once again utilized the power of a government agency, the powerful Bureau of Land Management (BLM), along with other federal and state agencies to assist him. Claiming that the mine’s very existence threatened an “endangered species” (the Desert Tortoise), BLM began to pound MPCM with a series of punishing legal actions. It did not take long for MPCM (coincidingly also facing the expense of repairing an environmentally hazardous broken water line) to succumb: After spending millions of dollars attempting to comply with BLM’s demands, though still not declaring bankruptcy, MPCM was forced to shut down all operations. China seemingly could not have asked for more from the Clinton Administration.                                  

However, Clinton’s assistance to China at the expense of American interests did not even end there. On October 10, 2000, just around three months before his second and final term in office was to end, President Clinton signed The China Trade Bill into law. That law granted China even further access to American technology, including technology related to LREE’s, HREE’s and permanent magnets – over all three of which China by then had already gained its aforenoted 80% global control – thanks to the help provided by President Clinton.                                                              

While it would sound nice to say that Presidents George W. Bush (2000-2008) and Barack Obama (2008-2016) took actions during their combined 16 years in office to reverse Clinton’s hideous policies, that unfortunately, would not be true. Rather, each separately allowed the last fleeting chance to regain America’s preeminence in the rare earth industry to disappear. That last fleeting chance, ironically, returned with the re-emergence of our old friend, the Mountain Pass California Mine.                 

In 2008 during the final year of the Bush presidency Molycore a newly formed American company purchased a then non-operational MPCM. The nascent company’s goal, which it spent a total of one billion dollars to achieve, was to return the mine back into working mode and eventually return it to its prior dominance. However, that was not be.  

Faced from the day of its launching through the following seven years of the Obama Administration with the same obstacles that had confronted the former owners of MPCM – cheap labor and the negligible environmental laws benefiting its Chinese competitor – and equally problematically, also faced with an increasing number of financially debilitating environmental regulations imposed first by the Bush and then the Obama administrations, Molycorp filed for bankruptcy in June, 2015 – and soon after it was placed under the administrative control of a United States Bankruptcy Court.                            

Incredibly, from within that court, China was to find yet another American friend: in June 2017, two years after the bankruptcy proceeding had begun – just five months after Donald Trump was sworn in as the 45th President of the United States – the Court agreed to sell the rights of MPCM to MP Materials, a consortium owned by American and Chinese companies, including, and here it becomes purposely tricky, the Chinese affiliated Shenghe Rare Earth Shareholding Company (SRESC). The price? An absurdly trifle $20 million. A small price for SRESC to pay at the time for further cementing China’s comprehensive control of the REE’s industry.   

However, any party that SRESC and their Chinese Communist Government masters might have planned to celebrate the benefits derived from this one-sided deal would have had to be cancelled- for them the party killer was President Donald Trump. Beginning in the early months of his Presidency, there began to be some bad news for the Chinese and some good news for Americans, for the first time in the nearly 20 years since this fiasco began.                

Quickly grasping the dangers that the Chinese control of both categories of REE’s and permanent magnets presented to America’s economic and military interests, Trump, on July 25, 2017, just six months after assuming office, issued a Presidential Declaration directing the federal government to develop a plan to reduce America’s reliance on China to supply these vital elements.               

That declaration was soon followed by another important initiative. On December, 20, 2017, the President signed Executive Order 13817, “A Federal Strategy to Ensure Secure and Reliable Supplies of Critical Minerals,”– an on-going act providing increased federal funding for American Defense agencies and American privately-owned companies to produce light and heavy REE’s, and other critical elements.            

Trump was not done there. Invoking, on July 22, 2019, a section of the Defense Production Act, Trump authorized the federal government to supply funds to American corporations for the domestic mining and processing of both categories of REE’s, as well for producing Rare Earth based permanent magnets.

Lastly, Trump also began to provide federal funds to several American Universities to support research to find the best methods to domestically produce and develop LREE’s and HREE’s. Currently, West Virginia University and several other universities are using those funds to develop methods to make rare earths from coal or coal-derived properties.

Still, while very promising, all of these efforts remain in their early stages, leaving America with a lot of ground to cover before it can catch up with and hopefully surpass China in the production and development of both forms of these REE’s and permanent magnets. And the stakes could not be higher.

With America in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic, the same Chinese Government that started this horror, through a state controlled national newspaper recently threatened to cut the supplies of drugs and other medicinal products it exports to America, warning it would result in plunging our great nation “into the mighty sea of coronavirus.”  

It is up to President Trump to continue to take the creative and bold actions that will prevent China from making good on that or similar threats, now, or any time in the future.

————————————————-

Robert Golomb is a nationally and internationally published columnist. Mail him at MrBob347@aol.com or follow him on Twitter@RobertGolomb


Gimme, Gimme Trump Treatment

Gimme, Gimme Trump Treatment

By Charles Vavruska

This is Charles Vavruska’s amazing story of his hydroxychloroquine treatment and cure after he was stricken with COVID-19 as published at Townhall.com, the leading source for conservative news and political commentary and analysis.  Charles Vavruska is a New York City-based parent activist and evangelist for the local Specialized High School Admissions Test.

 

QUEENS, New York — On Sunday night, March 15, I started feeling achy. By Monday night, I was achy all over. However, on Tuesday, I felt better, as I did all day Wednesday. On Thursday night, March 19, the aches returned. On Friday, I was sick: I had a fever, ached all over, was extremely lethargic, and lost my appetite.

That weekend, as I collapsed on my couch, President Donald J. Trump told journalists that he thought an anti-malaria drug called hydroxychloroquine might be a promising treatment against COVID-19. “I’m not saying it will, but I think that people may be surprised. By the way, that would be a game changer. But we’re going to know very soon,” Trump said about HCQ. “You’re going to see soon enough.”

Yes Mr. President, I did see.

The White House press corps immediately attacked Trump for pushing HCQ. As they slammed him, I dozed off. When I awoke an hour later, I heard NBC’s despicable, seriously woke host Chuck Todd still assaulting Trump for advocating what Dr. Todd mocked as some sort of snake oil. I thought to myself: This guy is so deranged, he hopes that HCQ fails, so more Americans will die — all to “stop Trump.”

All this while, I had dismissed the idea that COVID-19 had struck me. On Monday night, March 23, I walked up and down the stairs to my bathroom and first experienced shortness of breath. The next morning my wife Susan, God bless her, insisted that I go to urgent care.

As soon as I saw a doctor there, she said: “You have to go to the ER.”

“I’m not going to the ER,’’ I insisted.

She ordered a chest X-ray and a flu test. While the latter was negative, within 10 minutes, the X-ray revealed pneumonia in both lungs.

ER? What a great idea!

Because my Queens neighborhood is among the reddest on the COVID-19 heat maps, I knew that nearby Elmhurst Hospital was the epicenter of this pandemic. Fortunately, the FDNY EMS ambulance crew that whisked me away was extremely competent and accommodating. They agreed to speed me to New York Presbyterian Queens, which locals still call Booth Memorial. I had only the clothes on my back and my wallet. I needed my cell phone, but my family would be unable to bring it to me, as hospitals have become closed to visitors. Through complete serendipity, the ambulance made a wrong turn. As I sat inside the emergency vehicle, I noticed that we were going down my block. Since Susan and her sister were in hot pursuit in my sister-in-law’s Honda CRV, I asked the EMTs to stop at my house, so Susan could grab my cell phone and charger. They concurred, and we secured this vital communications link.

When we arrived at the hospital’s ambulance entrance, the stretchers were backed up to the door. We got the last spot inside the hallway before it spilled onto the loading dock. The EMTs were aggressive and assured that I got checked in and quickly transferred me to an emergency-room stretcher, down the hall and beyond the vestibule.

After about an hour in the ER hallway, an orderly moved me to a different open area that the hospital had transformed into a makeshift ER. Partitions, six feet apart, carved this space into temporary “hospital rooms,” each decorated with an easy chair. A nurse immediately tested me for COVID-19. At this point, I considered it a foregone conclusion that the vicious virus had struck me. Medics checked my vital signs, installed an IV, and put me on oxygen. (The nurse who inserted the IV, a veteran of America’s war in Southeast Asia, said that he survived a jump out of a plane in Vietnam, in which his parachute didn’t open.) After a tense, 90-minute wait, doctors admitted me as a patient.

Next stop: The third floor, which seemed to be a normal intensive-care unit. This was where patients waited for proper rooms. I was lucky enough to get an alcove that was converted into a two-bed “room.” Lucky? I avoided the adjacent hallway, which was filled with stretcher beds, lining both walls.

At 10:00 p.m. Wednesday, March 25, while still in this waiting area, my doctors gave me the bad, but unsurprising, news: I had tested positive for COVID-19. Within an hour, they put me on hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, which appears to enhance HCQ’s therapeutic effects.

Thursday morning, March 26, the doctor confirmed that I was taking the anti-malarial HCQ and Zithromax together. “The Trump Treatment?” I asked. “Yes,” she replied. “The Trump Treatment.”

That night, doctors transferred me to a room. I already felt better, just 19 hours after I first took the HCQ and Z-pack. Once in the room, which I shared with another man, everything was calm, and the care went from great to excellent.

Friday morning, a nurse asked me how I was.

“I feel good! I got the Trump Treatment.”

He laughed and asked, “Is that what they’re calling it on the street?”

Later that day, the same nurse told me that he had to give me a blood thinner. “Why?” I wondered.

“Because you are lying around and doing nothing all day,” he said. “We call it the Obama shot!”

By Saturday, March 28, the Trump Treatment seemed fully effective. After three days on it, my fever and aches had vanished, and my appetite and energy had reappeared. I remained on oxygen, but at a low level.

I stayed in the hospital until Thursday, April 2, as doctors monitored my breathing. That day, my physicians released me with an oxygen concentrator.

The hospital ordered me a Lyft and put me in a lift. I left, lugging the oxygen device, a box of accessories for it, and my few belongings. I tried to find my Lyft, as my pants nearly slipped off of me. Perhaps the hospital food cost me a few pounds.

The hospital told me to expect a gray Toyota. One finally approached. The driver took one look at me and locked the doors.

A few minutes later, my ride arrived. It looked like “The Lyft Driver in the Plastic Bubble.” A plastic sheet separated the front and back seats, much as John Travolta was isolated from the world in the schmaltzy, similarly titled 1976 TV movie. The hospital paid for the Lyft, but I saw no way to give the driver a tip. “There’s a Twenty on the back seat,” I told him, as I climbed out of the reverse med-evac.

I am home now. Although I still am on oxygen, I feel great. I credit the Trump Treatment for my recovery.

Americans, especially my fellow New Yorkers, are sick at home with COVID-19. Some of them will die without ever reaching a hospital to get the Trump Treatment.

Maddeningly, Governor Andrew Cuomo (D–NY) has banned the Trump Treatment, except in hospitals. This must change. Why not treat COVID-positive individuals before they deteriorate sufficiently to require hospitalization? Treating such outpatients with HCQ and Z-Pack will prevent more serious illness and relieve inundated hospitals.

Novartis, Teva, and other drug companies have donated some 100 million doses of HCQ to the federal government. Please, Mr. President. Make sure that every COVID-19 patient and doctor who want it can get the Trump Treatment.


Message of Hope, a Blessing for Easter, and a Prayer for America

Message of Hope, a Blessing for Easter, and a Prayer for America

We wish all our members, friends and families who celebrate, a blessed Good Friday and blissful Easter.

President Trump held an Easter Blessing on Good Friday at the White House with Bishop Henry Jackson. It was a great prayer and message of hope for America as the president wished everyone a Happy Easter Sunday celebrating the glorious resurrection, and asked Americans to pray for the nation to be healed.

He said “at this holy time our nation is engaged in a battle like never before, the invisible enemy. Our brave doctors, nurses, and first responders are fighting to save lives, our workers are racing to deliver critical medical supplies, our best scientists are working around the clock to develop life saving therapeutics, our people are making tremendous sacrifices to end this pandemic….Our nation will come through like never before.”

Bishop Jackson’s solemn prayer for America

“Lord let the death angel pass over. Let there be a mitigation of this plague, this disease. Let medical science come forth. Lord, let us come out with a thriving economy. But in this great land that was set up to glorify your name, we want to break, we come against the spirit of division. Lord, let ‘E Pluribus Unum’ be a reality in us. Let there be a uniting of America. Heal the divide between race, class and gender. Once again, give this great man, our president, and give our vice president wisdom beyond their natural limitations. Give them insight so they can cover us, lead us, and bless us. We bless them and America in Jesus’ name. Be encouraged, hope is on the way.”

Amen!

Happy & Healthy Easter Sunday to all!


Passover Message to our Jewish Members, Friends and Families

I want to wish all our Jewish members, friends and families a very happy and healthy Passover starting with tonight’s Seder. As we celebrate the festival of the liberation of the Jewish people, alone or with our immediate family or together on a digital platform, it’s important to remind ourselves about the true meaning of freedom and liberty and our mutual responsibility to save our country.

As we celebrate the Festival of Freedom during this “11th plague,” Christians celebrate Holy Week this week, and Jewish people retell the story of the Exodus out of slavery in Egypt to receive the Ten Commandments on Mount Sinai and ultimately reach the Holy Land to “Proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof!” from Leviticus 25:10, which formed the basis of our Judeo-Christian culture.

I want to share with you a very uplifting message of hope from a dear friend:

Wishing you a Passover that brings strength and good health to endure the year ahead.  Couldn’t be a more appropriate time for the angel of death to pass over all our homes especially while we are sheltering in place.  It is at stressful times like these that our resolve is strengthened and we question whether these things happen for a reason. Hopefully it will be a wake up call to save our country. Seems like G-d is sending that message and the President is the Moses of the modern era. We mourn those people however who have been sacrificed and let us pray that we will all emerge as a stronger and healthier country.
Chag Pesach Sameach

Best wishes for the safety, health and happiness of you and your loved ones. We, members of the Queens Village Republican Club believe we will come out of this pandemic stronger than before and our greatest days are ahead of us!

Phil Orenstein
President
Queens Village Republican Club
America’s Oldest Republican Club – Founded 1875
Please donate at www.qvgop.org


It takes an army to educate a child

It takes an army to educate a child

Letter from Sgt. Eric Spinner

 

Editors Note: This letter to the Queens Village Republican Club, from Sgt Eric Spinner, proud US Army Veteran and one of the directors of the NY Metro Chapter of ACT for America, was sent after participating in the club’s April 2nd Zoom Video Meeting on the Electoral College.  

Once again you have put together a terrific meeting.  Under the challenges we’re facing, it’s a terrific venue that unfortunately requires a verbal request for financial support.  Unless they figure out how to do a 50/50 online, that’s what we’re reduced to.  One way or another, we’ll make it work for us!

The choice of speakers was terrific.  Jerry Matacotta was new to my world, but I’ve heard Trent England before, and Nick Giordano was one of our leading speakers for a NYMetroACT meeting.  Their insight into the failures of the educational system is apparent in their analyses of the questions.

One of your guests, James M, had posted some questions about how to change the system, and gave as an example the fact that his sister taught in NYC and, if I may paraphrase, had no freedom to teach the facts or express her opinions for danger of being disciplined by superiors or denied union protections.  I understand that, having survived over 37 years in the NYC system.  However, I taught in a different era, and I probably got away with things that today’s teachers might not be able to get away with.  I spoke my mind and let the chips fall where they may!  I’d like to believe that I put many young errant minds back on track, but teaching is filled with intangibles- we don’t often get to see the results of our efforts.

Most of the speakers seemed to agree that involvement with the schools is a good idea, and the suggestion that getting involved at the lower grades is the way to proceed.  You can shout at the Chancellor of the NYCDOE all day and night to no avail.  But speaking with teachers at local board meetings can bear fruit.  I’m checking to see when my local districts meet, and those who see the problem and can present a legitimate case for change should do the same.

I also see this from the perspective of a military veteran.  The American Legion is very active in schools and teaches Americanism, Flag etiquette, and respect.  Another of my organizations, the Vietnam War Veterans Association, takes it a step further.  We have been going to about a dozen high schools, several middle schools and a few elementary schools for many years at the invitation of teachers and administrators.  We send a group of from 5-12 veterans, mostly Vietnam and Vietnam era, to teach social studies for the entire day, mostly about freedom, patriotism and service to country with a focus on the Vietnam era.  We have always been well-received by students and staff, and most react by saying that they never knew or understood much of what we presented.  My take on this is that the effort is not wasted, it’s just too limited in scope.

They say it takes a village to educate a child.  Perhaps it takes an army.  Perhaps we can be that army to get involved and make the change!  We certainly need it now!


Page 40 of 96« First...394041...Last »

Upcoming Events