Enjoy the latest news and events

QVGOP News Online

Available on your computer, tablet or any mobile device

What Every New York Voter Should Know and Do


By Lawrence Block

I am disappointed to hear that Sid Rosenberg and the owner of WABC 770 AM radio, Catsimatidis, are arguing for our Republican candidate for NYC Mayor, Curtis Sliwa to leave the mayoral race and to throw his support to the Independent candidate, Andrew Cuomo – father of No Cash Bail; speaker of the words, “America was never THAT great”; chargee of THIRTEEN women who claimed Cuomo committed sexual assault, abuse, etc., and the architect of sanctuary status in New York City and State.

Cuomo also received notoriety for issuing administrative orders that compelled nursing homes to accept COVID patients into their facilities, where over 16,000 seniors eventually died of the virus – arguably due to Cuomo’s ill-conceived mandates.

On a related matter, when President Trump moved boats into NY harbor that had been converted by Trump into floating hospitals for patients, Cuomo requested that the boats be refitted to meet the specific needs of COVID patients.   Once this was accomplished, Cuomo redirected all Covid patients to be transferred to existing and over-filled city hospitals and nursing homes rather than utilizing the floating hospitals provided by Trump. And so, the Covid floating hospitals remained empty until Trump reluctantly and finally moved the ships to a city that was more likely to utilize them.

I believe that Cuomo considers his game playing and his self-perceived showmanship in refusing to utilize Trump’s floating hospital facilities, that would have saved Covid sick New Yorkers from death, as an example of “standing up to Trump”.  During this time, too many New Yorkers died, and too many New Yorkers were left to mourn their loss of loved ones. 

And in Cuomo’s typical outrageous over-zealous hubris, he wrote a book touting his “leadership” during the Covid pandemic and profited off his direct involvement in the death of too many New Yorkers.  In fact, the New York Joint Commission (JCOPE) found Cuomo guilty of using taxpayers’ money, public-servant time and government staff to help write and promote his self-serving book.  As a result, Cuomo was ordered to pay back $5.1 million of his book profits to New York State.

Cuomo and Mamdani seem to agree on no cash bail, the “City of Yes”, other real-estate legislation that takes away decision making from local elected officials and places decision-making squarely in the hands of landlords and investors who have the capital to knock down single family houses and replace multiple lots with big buildings regardless of the zoning restrictions that previously existed. In other words, both Mamdani and Cuomo support practices guided by greed that will ultimately destroy the character of neighborhoods throughout New York City.  Cuomo and Mamdani also support Local Law 97 which was passed in 2019 as part of the Climate Mobilization Act.  In short, this law requires all condos and coops in NYC to convert by retrofitting for full electrification or no reliance on fossil fuels in different stages from now to 2050.  The exorbitant cost of these conversions will be passed on to apartment owners, substantially increasing in their monthly maintenance charges over the course from partial to full implementation.

It’s hard to determine if Cuomo still supports Affirming (trans) Care and boys in girl’s locker-rooms in public schools.  I’m guessing that both Cuomo and Mamdani support these policies including medical transitional practices that mutilate and scar our children by use of “Nazi-like medical experimentation procedures” that do irreversible harm. 

New York Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa on the other hand, holds more conservative and humane positions.  Mayoral candidate Curtis Sliwa is against No Cash Bail, Open borders, and sanctuary cities. In addition, he vehemently opposes defunding the police, stripping the police of insurance that is afforded to all city workers, closing Rikers and moving prisons to local neighborhoods.  Sliwa also stands alone in opposition to the City of Yes and to Local Law 97.

So generally, Cuomo and Mamdani hold very similar positions with the exception that Cuomo does not support the ideology behind Islamic extremism. 

In my opinion Mamdani is clearly an antisemite who supports Global Intifada because he refuses to denounce such practices.  He also refuses to denounce Hamas or to support the existence of the only Jewish state surrounded by many countries that harassed, evicted or killed their existing Jewish population.  He has threatened to arrest the Prime Minister of Israel but apparently would welcome to New York the Mullahs of Iran and the leaders of Hamas.  He has been known to take selfies with Ugandan leaders who introduced and implemented legislation that promotes the death penalty for lifestyles such as homosexuality and for all other non-traditional sexual relationships and alternative gender identifications. 

It’s noteworthy to mention that, during the debates, both Cuomo and Mamdani proudly promised to fight Trump.  This pathetic strategy is very different from the stance that Mayoral candidate Curtis Sliwa described, emphasizing negotiating with the president to achieve a balance of policies that are good for Americans and that greatly benefit New York City residents.  

Given the above, I have decided that the new face of the democrat party is at least more forthright in representing the socialist, the antisemitic and the anti-American ideologies of the Democratic party. At least with Mamdani, we know exactly who and what we’re dealing with – an extreme progressive, Marxist, Communist who hates the USA, Jews and embraces organizations that chant, kill the infidels. For those college and high school students who may not know this, an infidel is anyone who doesn’t believe in and doesn’t practice Islam in a prescribed manner. 

If elected and based on the plans he has presented to the public, it appears that Mamdani will take steps to continue the steady decline of our city.  If New Yorkers vote for the likes of Cuomo or Mandani, the damage they leave behind will be attributable to the voters who put them in office.   

It is not clear if what Mamdani says is what he will do.  But here are my best guesses on this matter:  Higher rents for those who earn a salary including seniors who receive monthly social security checks; substantial raises in costs for condominium and cooperative owners to pay for full conversions from gas to electric and increases for all real-estate owners in the form of property taxes; less prisoners in jail and more of them let loose on the streets hurting you and your children; because Mamdani is planning to invest millions of dollars in affirming care, more children in NYC will be buying into the propaganda on transitioning from their gender of birth to their gender by identification. You may have missed that the democrats and voters in NYS have passed legislation that clearly indicates that parents do not have rights to interfere with affirming care of their children. 

Also, there will be a coordinated effort by Mamdani and the UFT to wage war against charter schools and to firmly cap their expansion, regardless of the thousands of children and their parents who are on a waiting list for admission.  In addition, more indoctrination in the schools, perhaps justifying Hamas as freedom fighters and Israel and the United States as colonizers.  Don’t be surprised if an increasing number of students believe that the Holocaust was just a farce.

The state education department, along with the unions, are doing their very best to shield students from standardized testing.  With little or no measures of accountability except for subjective criteria, it will be difficult to determine student progress. No need to worry though; according to the powers that preside over the school system, you can be confident that they will report that all the children are doing just fine. 

Taxes on earners will go up as well as other indices such as sales tax, city tax, state tax and perhaps even a tax on the taxes.   Afterall, when the rich and upper middle class flee the city for more favorable living and earning conditions, it will be up to the diminishing middle class to shoulder the responsibility of making their earnings available for redistribution to the needy and to the ever-growing stream of illegal aliens into our marvellous sanctuary city. 

Reasonably, even illegal aliens need free hotels, culturally appropriate food, new clothes, dry cleaning, laundry services, social security and health care and free education. So, kiss-goodbye reduced class size and welcome all discretionary and redirected funds to English as a Second Language initiatives.

In my opinion, with illegal aliens on the social security payroll and on the Medicare and Medicaid caseloads, anticipated reductions in Social Security benefits and health-care services may move back from 2034 to 2030.  I also suggest that you don’t delay going to the doctor because your social security funds and health benefits may go bust sooner than later.

If you vote for Mamdani or for Cuomo, don’t complain when no cash bail continues, when unrehabilitated prisoners are released because Mamdani believes that the responsibility for crime is with the society and not with the individual.  Along these lines, Mamdani refers to crime as a social construct. Also, as expected, Cuomo takes no responsibility for the city’s crime, for the homeless situation and for the invasion of illegal aliens in New York City.  It is not surprising that Cuomo blames Trump for all of Cuomo’s missteps and devastating decisions.  With these two candidates do you really have any choice?  If either Mamdani or Cuomo become the mayor, our city will suffer.  If you vote for either one of them, you will be complicit in the downfall of our city.  Better to fight it than to join it. Given all the above, win or lose, I strongly endorse Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa for New York City Mayor. 


Why I’m Standing with Curtis Sliwa — Not Cuomo

This letter was written in response to a friend who made an appeal to vote for Cuomo over Sliwa to stop Mamdani.

I live my life every day with a lot of unknowns, but I know this much: I will stick to my principles and let the chips fall where they may. I will never vote for Andrew Cuomo. He talks down to people; you can hear it in his voice. I’m not going to be sold a bag of garbage wrapped up and marketed as gold.

By Ira Harris

The question I keep asking is this: why have so many powerful figures — Catsimatidis and others — chosen to back Adams first and now Cuomo, instead of supporting Curtis Sliwa from the start? If Cuomo is truly the “savior” they now claim, why did they ignore him when the city needed saving? And if they think Mamdani is dangerous, why rally behind someone who has already caused so much harm to New York State and City?

Let’s not forget who these people really are.
Eric Adams — once a leader of the racist “100 Black Law Enforcement Officers” group — is the same man who stood at bus depots welcoming illegal migrants into New York, handing out $500-a-night hotel rooms, and proudly calling himself “the Biden of Brooklyn.” Cuomo is no better. He promised to look into fracking, then banned it the moment he took office while neighboring states prospered from it. He lectured us daily during COVID while his disastrous nursing home policies killed thousands of seniors.

When Governor Hochul handed out outrageously overpriced COVID test contracts to her donors — double what California paid — Cuomo said nothing. When a woman was set on fire in the subway, Cuomo said nothing. When Adams refused to unleash the police on violent rioters and antisemitic mobs on college campuses, Cuomo said nothing — while Curtis Sliwa was out there getting his jaw broken defending small businesses and everyday New Yorkers. Cuomo said nothing as Adams packed illegal migrants into Creedmoor and other city shelters. Yet now Cuomo rides in on a shiny horse as if we’re supposed to forget his record — and we’re expected to sell out our values to vote for him?

Where was Cuomo when the socialist wing of his party was taking over? He was being wined, dined, and pocket lined like every other corrupt New York politician.

Yes, I understand the fear — people say we must vote for Cuomo to stop Mamdani, especially because of how dangerous Mamdani would be for the Jewish community. That emotional appeal tugs at us. But are we really going to abandon our values and reward corruption just because we fear something worse?

Maybe I’m an idealist — or maybe I just have a long memory. I believe even if Mamdani wins, there’s a limit to how far he can go before New Yorkers rise up and demand change. If that happens, the backlash will be fierce. The people will wake up, and pressure will mount on Albany — maybe even paving the way for leaders like Elise Stefanik to step in next year. And I believe President Trump will keep a watchful eye and do his part to limit the damage.

But who knows — maybe Curtis Sliwa will shock them all and win this race, and everyone will have to eat crow.

I live my life every day with a lot of unknowns, but I know this much: I will stick to my principles and let the chips fall where they may. I will never vote for Andrew Cuomo. He talks down to people; you can hear it in his voice. I’m not going to be sold a bag of garbage wrapped up and marketed as gold.

Your friend, Ira


Boycott WABC

“….it is imperative for us, as working-class New Yorkers, to boycott WABC. John Catsimatidis has betrayed a true Conservative New Yorker who worked at his station for 35 years in favor of a man who stated that people like us who believe in traditional values have no place in New York.”


Why has Election Integrity in the USA Become the Need of the Hour?

By Ankush Bhandari

On March 25, 2025, US President Donald J Trump signed an executive order “PRESERVING AND PROTECTING THE INTEGRITY OF AMERICAN ELECTIONS”, which starts with section 1 stating “Purpose and Policy.  Despite pioneering self-government, the United States now fails to enforce basic and necessary election protections employed by modern, developed nations, as well as those still developing.  India and Brazil, for example, are tying voter identification to a biometric database, while the United States largely relies on self-attestation for citizenship.  In tabulating votes, Germany and Canada require use of paper ballots, counted in public by local officials, which substantially reduces the number of disputes as compared to the American patchwork of voting methods that can lead to basic chain-of-custody problems.  Further, while countries like Denmark and Sweden sensibly limit mail-in voting to those unable to vote in person and do not count late-arriving votes regardless of the date of postmark, many American elections now feature mass voting by mail, with many officials accepting ballots without postmarks or those received well after Election Day. 

Free, fair, and honest elections unmarred by fraud, errors, or suspicion are fundamental to maintaining our constitutional Republic.  The right of American citizens to have their votes properly counted and tabulated, without illegal dilution, is vital to determining the rightful winner of an election”.

The Executive Order has total 11 sections which includes Enforcing the Citizenship Requirement for Federal Elections, Providing Other Assistance to States Verifying Eligibility,  Improving the Election Assistance Commission,  Prosecuting Election Crimes, Improving Security of Voting Systems,  Compliance with Federal Law Setting the National Election Day. Preventing Foreign Interference and Unlawful Use of Federal Funds, Federal Actions to Address Executive Order 14019, Severability, and General Provisions

Now, many across the aisle have raised the question, whether the Purpose mentioned in President Trump’s Executive Order is really the need of the hour or not.


YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS ON THE BALLOT: VOTE NO ON ALL SIX BALLOT PROPOSALS!

At our October 9th Queens Village Republican Club meeting, City Councilman Robert Holden sounded the alarm: when you go to vote, turn over your ballot and vote NO on all six proposals.

These so-called “ballot proposals” are not harmless. They represent sweeping changes to the New York City Charter—the city’s governing document—and to the New York State Constitution. Councilman Holden made it clear: these proposals are crafted to deceive voters with feel-good language like “affordable housing” while concealing their true intent—to strip local communities of control and hand unprecedented power to unelected bureaucrats and developers.

Mayor Adams created the Charter Revision Commission and filled it with his own appointees, who now serve as rubber stamps for his agenda. The result is a set of proposals that override your elected officials, civic organizations, and community boards. It’s Mayor Adam’s gift to his developer friends, who have returned the favor with millions of dollars in contributions to his campaign coffers when he was running for mayor.  These proposals include his destructive Housing Proposals 2, 3 and 4, which have misleading descriptions that hide their real impact: to take away your power.

Councilman Holden described these proposals as “the City of Yes on steroids,” because they fast-track radical rezoning schemes that would flood quiet residential neighborhoods with high-density development, all without meaningful public input or accountability.

Here is a guide to the six proposals you’ll see on the ballot this November. Don’t be fooled by the misleading wording. Each one erodes community control and strengthens the hand of City Hall insiders.

Proposal 1:  Amend the State Constitution to allow an Olympic Sports Complex on state-owned forest land in the Adirondacks.
This doesn’t affect us directly, but opens the door to further encroachment on protected state lands, and the potential for government corruption. Vote NO.

Proposal 2:  Transfers local zoning and housing approval power from your elected representatives to unelected mayoral appointees.
This proposal eliminates community oversight and fast-tracks the construction of high-density public housing in the community districts that produce the least affordable housing. That means our own low-density residential neighborhoods, which would become alien to us if this proposal along with 3 and 4 passes. Once passed, you will lose all control over what gets built in your community, and there’s nothing you could do to stop it. Vote NO.

Proposal 3:  Fast-tracks housing approvals and shortens public review periods to just 90 days.
This undermines community input and allows developments to move forward before residents even have time to respond. Vote NO.

Proposal 4:  Creates an “Affordable Housing Appeals Board” that can override City Council votes and community objections.
This new board—controlled by the Mayor, Borough President, and Council Speaker—would silence your local representatives and empower developers to bypass neighborhood concerns about schools, parks, and infrastructure. Vote NO.

Proposal 5:  Centralizes and digitizes the City Map under the Department of City Planning.
Currently, each borough maintains its own maps, allowing for local oversight. This change concentrates control in one Manhattan-based agency and removes borough-level transparency. Vote NO.

Proposal 6:  Moves City elections to coincide with Presidential election years.
While this may sound convenient, it’s designed to bury local issues under the national spotlight and diminish the voice of neighborhood voters. Keep Federal and City election dates in separate years the way they are.  Vote NO.

Your Voice, Your Neighborhood

Mayor Adams’ six deceptive proposals would permanently weaken local democracy and hand control to City Hall and politically connected developers. Don’t be misled by the sugar-coated ballot language. When you vote, turn over your ballot and vote NO on all six proposals.Remember: your neighborhood is on the ballot— voting matters and elections have consequences.

These guidelines were compiled from Councilman Holden’s October 9th presentation, whatsonmyballot.nyc, and other sources.


PRESS RELEASE: CURTIS OR BUST!


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Joseph Concannon 347-946-1931
Queens Village Republican Club
Email: info@qvgop.org
Website: www.QVGOP.org
Date:
October 21, 2025


CURTIS OR BUST!

Queens Village Republican Club Stands Unshakably with Curtis Sliwa for Mayor of New York City

Queens, NY — The members of the Queens Village Republican Club, America’s oldest Republican club, proudly stand shoulder to shoulder with Curtis Sliwa — our fighter, our champion, and the people’s candidate for Mayor of New York City. Curtis is a tireless advocate for everyday New Yorkers, a man of unshakable integrity who cannot be bought or bullied.

For decades, Curtis has taken on corrupt politicians, crooked bureaucrats, and even survived violent attacks from organized crime — always fighting for the people of this city he loves. He has never stopped standing up for what’s right.

Let’s be clear: Curtis didn’t give us bail reform. He didn’t cause 15,000 nursing home deaths. He didn’t raise our taxes or resign in disgrace like Andrew Cuomo. And unlike Zohran Mamdani, Curtis doesn’t believe in draining the city treasury for radical, unworkable giveaways.

Curtis Sliwa is the adult in the room — the seasoned New Yorker who knows every neighborhood, every subway line, every struggle of working-class families. He will take on Cuomo, “the architect,” and Mamdani, “the apprentice,” and lead New York City back to safety, sanity, and prosperity.

This election is not about billionaires or political insiders — it’s about the people. And the people are speaking loud and clear: CURTIS OR BUST!

Join Curtis and Nancy Sliwa on October 25th, the first day of early voting, and make your voice heard. With your vote and support, Curtis will lead the revitalization of New York City and restore pride in the greatest city in the world.


About the Queens Village Republican Club

Founded in 1875, the Queens Village Republican Club is the oldest continuously active Republican club in America. Dedicated to the enduring principles of liberty, opportunity, and patriotism, QVRC continues to lead the charge for good government and Republican values in New York City.


Grand Opening of the Eastern Queens Campaign HQ with Curtis Sliwa


It was a packed house on Tuesday 10/14/25, as 200 people received a grand welcome to the Eastern Queens Campaign HQ for Curtis Sliwa for NYC Mayor, as Curtis fired up the crowd to fight for nothing less than victory! The HQ is open from 12 noon to 9pm every day until election day, Nov 4th, for phone banking, canvassing, to pick up lawn signs, palm cards, store window posters, and other materials. We are making 100’s of calls a day to urge all voters, Democrats, Reps, Indies, and Blanks to vote for Curtis to protect and save NYC, and make it safe, clean, and affordable for all New Yorkers. Many thanks to James Doukas for videotaping the event and Barry Brown for the photography. HQ Address: 258-06 Hillside Ave. Floral Park, NY 11004.

Video of the Grand Opening of the Eastern Queens Campaign HQ with Curtis Sliwa

Photos of the Event








All Republicans Must Unite Behind Curtis Sliwa


By Phil Orenstein

Curtis Sliwa is our Republican candidate for Mayor of New York City. The Democrats are fractured and demoralized, locked in a bitter struggle between moderates and socialist extremists. Recently, Governor Hochul endorsed Mamdani, while State Democratic Party Chairman Jay Jacobs flatly rejected him. With Democrats in disarray, it is vital that Republicans stand shoulder to shoulder, unite, and rally behind our standard-bearer, Curtis Sliwa, in the most consequential race for New York City’s future in 2025. And he will win.


Why We Vote: Keeping the Republic Alive

From Ancient Sparta to Franklin: the duty of citizens is to use our greatest power in this historic election


By Phil Orenstein

We are all familiar with the immortal words of the Declaration of Independence, which proclaim that to secure the unalienable rights of “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness…Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” In plain terms, governments exist to protect the rights of the people and derive their power only from the people’s authority. That is why we vote.

In 1787, on the final day of the Constitutional Convention, Benjamin Franklin was asked as he left Independence Hall what form of government the founders had created. “Well Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?” a lady asked. Franklin replied, “A republic—if you can keep it.” More than two centuries later, it is our responsibility as American citizens to keep it. That is why we vote.

Voting is our power. If we fail to exercise it, we give up our greatest power as citizens. And for us New Yorkers, in the midst of the most consequential election in our city’s history, that power is more urgent than ever.

But we must not vote blindly, by habit, by party, or by narrow self-interest. Voting is not about what government can hand out, or which side can shout the loudest. It is a civic right and solemn responsibility, grounded in the legacy of Western Civilization—from the citizenship of ancient Greece, to the rule of law under Rome, the Italian Renaissance, the Glorious Revolution of England and the Enlightenment, the American Revolution, and the vision of our Founding Fathers. We vote to uphold freedom of speech, individual rights, and religious liberty. To keep our republic, we must vote, and we must vote wisely.

That requires being informed. We must know the background, character, and policies of the candidates. Go to civic meetings, forums, and debates. Study their platforms on our schools, taxes, public safety, quality of life, the “City of Yes” zoning schemes threatening neighborhoods, the crushing cost of living, and, most importantly, our freedom and dignity. Do their policies strengthen families and communities, or do they undermine them?

Government draws its power from the people who vote. Through voting, we shape a government in our own image. It is not meant to be a shallow popularity contest. Mamdani may be articulate with a pleasant smile, but his policies are socialist fantasies unmoored from reality. Cuomo may have a commanding presence and a silver tongue, but his record reveals a manipulative man who inflicted suffering on millions of New Yorkers. We must see through appearances and hold fast to substance.

Some dismiss voting as unimportant, but it is the foundation of our republic. In Australia, citizens are fined if they fail to vote. In America, it remains a free choice—but our freedom is preserved only when we exercise it. The progressive elites, with their wealthy patrons and media allies, want us to stay home while they mobilize their followers. They belittle Curtis Sliwa, the only candidate who truly fights for ordinary New Yorkers, sneering that he is too unsophisticated to win. But their condescension reveals their weakness. They are terrified of regular citizens rising up to take back their city.

Curtis represents the people. He is not controlled by the powerful or the wealthy. He is a true New Yorker, one of us. He knows that government must remain in the hands of the citizens—and that power rests with the ballot.

In the last mayoral election, turnout was a meager 21%. In earlier elections, more than half of the voters came out to the polls. This time we can do much better—and if we do, we will win.

Defeatism is the enemy’s greatest weapon. In politics, as in war or sports, you cannot go in believing you’ve already lost. The enemy wants you to feel beaten before the contest even begins. Don’t believe it. The pundits swore Trump would lose, yet Trump 45 and 47 prevailed.

We the people must believe Mamdani can be defeated, and Curtis can win. Victory depends on citizens who refuse to surrender. Attend meetings and fundraisers, talk to your neighbors, hand out literature, display signs, knock on doors, vote early, and help others get to the polls.

In a free society, we must keep fighting—fighting for America, and now for New York City. And fighting means voting.

This is our fight. Curtis Sliwa is fighting for us, just as King Leonidas of Sparta stood with 300 warriors against the vast Persian army at Thermopylae in 480 BC to save Greece and Western Civilization. As one sage put it, “The Spartans didn’t just conquer their enemies, they conquered themselves first.”

We must be the Spartans in this battle for New York City. Never retreat. Never surrender. As King Leonidas declared:

“Spartans never retreat! Spartans never surrender! Go spread the word. Let every Greek assembled know the truth of this. Let each among them search his own soul. And while you’re at it, search your own.”

Now is the time. Believe, fight, and get out and vote.

Phil Orenstein, President of the Queens Village Republican Club, America’s oldest Republican Club.


Vote Sliwa to Save the American Dream

By Paul King, former Republican candidate for U.S. Congress, NY-05 in 2024

Who is the greatest enemy of a Socialist/Marxist? No, it’s not rich people. It’s YOU.

Queens is the home of the American Dream. It is the first stop in the land of opportunity for immigrants and first-generation Americans. For homeowners who may have spent decades or generations working toward a family home, our residential neighborhoods are where those dreams came true. A vote for Mamdani (or frankly, Cuomo) is a vote to destroy your dreams.

Socialists despise people who believe they can build a better life through faith and hard work. That covers almost every working-class and middle-class New Yorker. Almost certainly, you are the philosophical enemy of Zohran Mamdani. Why? Because your success proves them wrong.


Page 2 of 97123...Last »

Upcoming Events