Phil Orenstein

Author Archives

Why I’m Standing with Curtis Sliwa — Not Cuomo

This letter was written in response to a friend who made an appeal to vote for Cuomo over Sliwa to stop Mamdani.

I live my life every day with a lot of unknowns, but I know this much: I will stick to my principles and let the chips fall where they may. I will never vote for Andrew Cuomo. He talks down to people; you can hear it in his voice. I’m not going to be sold a bag of garbage wrapped up and marketed as gold.

By Ira Harris

The question I keep asking is this: why have so many powerful figures — Catsimatidis and others — chosen to back Adams first and now Cuomo, instead of supporting Curtis Sliwa from the start? If Cuomo is truly the “savior” they now claim, why did they ignore him when the city needed saving? And if they think Mamdani is dangerous, why rally behind someone who has already caused so much harm to New York State and City?

Let’s not forget who these people really are.
Eric Adams — once a leader of the racist “100 Black Law Enforcement Officers” group — is the same man who stood at bus depots welcoming illegal migrants into New York, handing out $500-a-night hotel rooms, and proudly calling himself “the Biden of Brooklyn.” Cuomo is no better. He promised to look into fracking, then banned it the moment he took office while neighboring states prospered from it. He lectured us daily during COVID while his disastrous nursing home policies killed thousands of seniors.

When Governor Hochul handed out outrageously overpriced COVID test contracts to her donors — double what California paid — Cuomo said nothing. When a woman was set on fire in the subway, Cuomo said nothing. When Adams refused to unleash the police on violent rioters and antisemitic mobs on college campuses, Cuomo said nothing — while Curtis Sliwa was out there getting his jaw broken defending small businesses and everyday New Yorkers. Cuomo said nothing as Adams packed illegal migrants into Creedmoor and other city shelters. Yet now Cuomo rides in on a shiny horse as if we’re supposed to forget his record — and we’re expected to sell out our values to vote for him?

Where was Cuomo when the socialist wing of his party was taking over? He was being wined, dined, and pocket lined like every other corrupt New York politician.

Yes, I understand the fear — people say we must vote for Cuomo to stop Mamdani, especially because of how dangerous Mamdani would be for the Jewish community. That emotional appeal tugs at us. But are we really going to abandon our values and reward corruption just because we fear something worse?

Maybe I’m an idealist — or maybe I just have a long memory. I believe even if Mamdani wins, there’s a limit to how far he can go before New Yorkers rise up and demand change. If that happens, the backlash will be fierce. The people will wake up, and pressure will mount on Albany — maybe even paving the way for leaders like Elise Stefanik to step in next year. And I believe President Trump will keep a watchful eye and do his part to limit the damage.

But who knows — maybe Curtis Sliwa will shock them all and win this race, and everyone will have to eat crow.

I live my life every day with a lot of unknowns, but I know this much: I will stick to my principles and let the chips fall where they may. I will never vote for Andrew Cuomo. He talks down to people; you can hear it in his voice. I’m not going to be sold a bag of garbage wrapped up and marketed as gold.

Your friend, Ira


Boycott WABC

“….it is imperative for us, as working-class New Yorkers, to boycott WABC. John Catsimatidis has betrayed a true Conservative New Yorker who worked at his station for 35 years in favor of a man who stated that people like us who believe in traditional values have no place in New York.”


Why has Election Integrity in the USA Become the Need of the Hour?

By Ankush Bhandari

On March 25, 2025, US President Donald J Trump signed an executive order “PRESERVING AND PROTECTING THE INTEGRITY OF AMERICAN ELECTIONS”, which starts with section 1 stating “Purpose and Policy.  Despite pioneering self-government, the United States now fails to enforce basic and necessary election protections employed by modern, developed nations, as well as those still developing.  India and Brazil, for example, are tying voter identification to a biometric database, while the United States largely relies on self-attestation for citizenship.  In tabulating votes, Germany and Canada require use of paper ballots, counted in public by local officials, which substantially reduces the number of disputes as compared to the American patchwork of voting methods that can lead to basic chain-of-custody problems.  Further, while countries like Denmark and Sweden sensibly limit mail-in voting to those unable to vote in person and do not count late-arriving votes regardless of the date of postmark, many American elections now feature mass voting by mail, with many officials accepting ballots without postmarks or those received well after Election Day. 

Free, fair, and honest elections unmarred by fraud, errors, or suspicion are fundamental to maintaining our constitutional Republic.  The right of American citizens to have their votes properly counted and tabulated, without illegal dilution, is vital to determining the rightful winner of an election”.

The Executive Order has total 11 sections which includes Enforcing the Citizenship Requirement for Federal Elections, Providing Other Assistance to States Verifying Eligibility,  Improving the Election Assistance Commission,  Prosecuting Election Crimes, Improving Security of Voting Systems,  Compliance with Federal Law Setting the National Election Day. Preventing Foreign Interference and Unlawful Use of Federal Funds, Federal Actions to Address Executive Order 14019, Severability, and General Provisions

Now, many across the aisle have raised the question, whether the Purpose mentioned in President Trump’s Executive Order is really the need of the hour or not.


YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS ON THE BALLOT: VOTE NO ON ALL SIX BALLOT PROPOSALS!

At our October 9th Queens Village Republican Club meeting, City Councilman Robert Holden sounded the alarm: when you go to vote, turn over your ballot and vote NO on all six proposals.

These so-called “ballot proposals” are not harmless. They represent sweeping changes to the New York City Charter—the city’s governing document—and to the New York State Constitution. Councilman Holden made it clear: these proposals are crafted to deceive voters with feel-good language like “affordable housing” while concealing their true intent—to strip local communities of control and hand unprecedented power to unelected bureaucrats and developers.

Mayor Adams created the Charter Revision Commission and filled it with his own appointees, who now serve as rubber stamps for his agenda. The result is a set of proposals that override your elected officials, civic organizations, and community boards. It’s Mayor Adam’s gift to his developer friends, who have returned the favor with millions of dollars in contributions to his campaign coffers when he was running for mayor.  These proposals include his destructive Housing Proposals 2, 3 and 4, which have misleading descriptions that hide their real impact: to take away your power.

Councilman Holden described these proposals as “the City of Yes on steroids,” because they fast-track radical rezoning schemes that would flood quiet residential neighborhoods with high-density development, all without meaningful public input or accountability.

Here is a guide to the six proposals you’ll see on the ballot this November. Don’t be fooled by the misleading wording. Each one erodes community control and strengthens the hand of City Hall insiders.

Proposal 1:  Amend the State Constitution to allow an Olympic Sports Complex on state-owned forest land in the Adirondacks.
This doesn’t affect us directly, but opens the door to further encroachment on protected state lands, and the potential for government corruption. Vote NO.

Proposal 2:  Transfers local zoning and housing approval power from your elected representatives to unelected mayoral appointees.
This proposal eliminates community oversight and fast-tracks the construction of high-density public housing in the community districts that produce the least affordable housing. That means our own low-density residential neighborhoods, which would become alien to us if this proposal along with 3 and 4 passes. Once passed, you will lose all control over what gets built in your community, and there’s nothing you could do to stop it. Vote NO.

Proposal 3:  Fast-tracks housing approvals and shortens public review periods to just 90 days.
This undermines community input and allows developments to move forward before residents even have time to respond. Vote NO.

Proposal 4:  Creates an “Affordable Housing Appeals Board” that can override City Council votes and community objections.
This new board—controlled by the Mayor, Borough President, and Council Speaker—would silence your local representatives and empower developers to bypass neighborhood concerns about schools, parks, and infrastructure. Vote NO.

Proposal 5:  Centralizes and digitizes the City Map under the Department of City Planning.
Currently, each borough maintains its own maps, allowing for local oversight. This change concentrates control in one Manhattan-based agency and removes borough-level transparency. Vote NO.

Proposal 6:  Moves City elections to coincide with Presidential election years.
While this may sound convenient, it’s designed to bury local issues under the national spotlight and diminish the voice of neighborhood voters. Keep Federal and City election dates in separate years the way they are.  Vote NO.

Your Voice, Your Neighborhood

Mayor Adams’ six deceptive proposals would permanently weaken local democracy and hand control to City Hall and politically connected developers. Don’t be misled by the sugar-coated ballot language. When you vote, turn over your ballot and vote NO on all six proposals.Remember: your neighborhood is on the ballot— voting matters and elections have consequences.

These guidelines were compiled from Councilman Holden’s October 9th presentation, whatsonmyballot.nyc, and other sources.


Page 3 of 328« First...234...Last »

Upcoming Events